In re the Estate of Moore

24 P. 846, 86 Cal. 72, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 975
California Supreme Court·Decided September 19, 1890·No. No. 13851·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Sharpstein, J.

— This appeal is from an order appointing Helen M. Moore general administratrix of said [73]*73estate. It appears by the bill of exceptions that Thomas W. Moore was duly appointed administrator of said estate on the fourth day of March, 1872, and that he continued such administrator until August29 or September 7, 1888, when he was removed by order of the court. From that order he appealed to the supreme court, and said appeal was pending in said supreme court when said Helen M. Moore was appointed administratrix of said estate by the order of the court from which this appeal is taken. The contention of appellant is, that, pending an appeal from the order removing Thomas W. Moore from the administration of the estate in question, the court had no authority to appoint other than a special administrator. In support of that contention he cites section 1411 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides, among other things, that when an executor or administrator dies or is suspended or removed, the superior court or a judge thereof must appoint a special administrator.” Pending the appeal of Thomas W. Moore from the order removing him, he was suspended from office, and it was within the power of the court to appoint a special administrator to act during the period of suspension, but not to appoint a general administrator until such order or removal became final. The grounds upon which we are urged to dismiss the appeal are not sufficient to justify a dismissal.

Thornton, J., and McFarland, J., concurred.

Plearing in Bank denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Moore, 24 P. 846, 86 Cal. 72, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 975 (Cal. 1890).

24 P. 846 (In re the Estate of Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Buchman
291 P.2d 547 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Buchman
291 P.2d 547 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Guardianship of Jacobson
182 P.2d 537 (California Supreme Court, 1947)
Breiting v. District Court of Salt Lake County
272 P. 562 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)
Pedroli v. Scott
221 P. 241 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1923)
Chadbourne v. Chadbourne
112 P. 472 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
Davenport v. Davenport
60 A. 379 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1904)
Guardianship of Van Loan
76 P. 39 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
State ex rel. Richardson v. Superior Courty
69 P. 375 (Washington Supreme Court, 1902)
More v. More
59 P. 823 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
More v. Miller
53 P. 1077 (California Supreme Court, 1898)