In re the Estate of Mingoia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Mingoia

212 A.D.2d 531, 623 N.Y.S.2d 113

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 531 (In re the Estate of Mingoia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Mingoia, 212 A.D.2d 531, 623 N.Y.S.2d 113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding for an accounting, the attorney representing the estate appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County (Signorelli, S.), dated August 3, 1993, which directed him to reimburse the estate $7,910 for attorney’s fees in excess of those allowed by the court and $1,700 for accountant’s fees paid by the estate.

[532]*532Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts, (1) by deleting from the first decretal paragraph thereof the sum $7,910 and substituting therefor the sum $1,500 and (2) by deleting therefrom the second decretal paragraph directing the appellant to reimburse the estate $1,700 for accountant’s fees; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After reviewing the executor’s final account and the appellant’s request for legal fees, the Surrogate determined that the appellant’s work in connection with the settlement of the estate of Olive Philomene Mingoia was essentially routine and included some services that were executorial in nature. Accordingly, the Surrogate directed the appellant to reimburse the estate $7,910 in excess legal fees and $1,700 for accountant’s fees that had been paid by the estate.

While we agree with the Surrogate that some of the services performed by the appellant were executorial in nature and, thus, were not compensable in the form of a legal fee (see generally, Matter of Bobeck, 196 AD2d 496; Matter of Passuello, 184 AD2d 108; Matter of Verplanck, 151 AD2d 767; Matter of Von Hofe, 145 AD2d 424), our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that the appellant should reimburse the estate $1,500 rather than $7,910 for excess legal fees. Furthermore, under the circumstances of this case, the appellant did not act improperly by recommending the hiring of a certified public accountant to perform tax services, and he should not be required to reimburse the estate for the accountant’s fees. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding for an accounting, the attorney representing the estate appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County (Signorelli, S.), dated August 3, 1993, which directed him to reimburse the estate $7,910 for attorney’s fees in excess of those allowed by the court and $1,700 for accountant’s fees paid by the estate.

[532]*532Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts, (1) by deleting from the first decretal paragraph thereof the sum $7,910 and substituting therefor the sum $1,500 and (2) by deleting therefrom the second decretal paragraph directing the appellant to reimburse the estate $1,700 for accountant’s fees; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After reviewing the executor’s final account and the appellant’s request for legal fees, the Surrogate determined that the appellant’s work in connection with the settlement of the estate of Olive Philomene Mingoia was essentially routine and included some services that were executorial in nature. Accordingly, the Surrogate directed the appellant to reimburse the estate $7,910 in excess legal fees and $1,700 for accountant’s fees that had been paid by the estate.

While we agree with the Surrogate that some of the services performed by the appellant were executorial in nature and, thus, were not compensable in the form of a legal fee (see generally, Matter of Bobeck, 196 AD2d 496; Matter of Passuello, 184 AD2d 108; Matter of Verplanck, 151 AD2d 767; Matter of Von Hofe, 145 AD2d 424), our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that the appellant should reimburse the estate $1,500 rather than $7,910 for excess legal fees. Furthermore, under the circumstances of this case, the appellant did not act improperly by recommending the hiring of a certified public accountant to perform tax services, and he should not be required to reimburse the estate for the accountant’s fees. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 531, 623 N.Y.S.2d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-mingoia-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack