In re the Estate of Mettler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Mettler

283 A.D.2d 343, 724 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6276

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 29, 2001·Published

Opinion

—Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Renee Roth, S.), entered on or about February 25, 2000, which, in an estate accounting, inter alia, determined the value of appellant attorney’s services to the estate, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant was not entitled to a hearing on the issue of the value of his services, having expressly waived any right thereto (see, Matter of Goldman v Goldman, 201 AD2d 860, 862). The record supports the findings of the Surrogate underlying her assessment of appellant’s services. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Renee Roth, S.), entered on or about February 25, 2000, which, in an estate accounting, inter alia, determined the value of appellant attorney’s services to the estate, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant was not entitled to a hearing on the issue of the value of his services, having expressly waived any right thereto (see, Matter of Goldman v Goldman, 201 AD2d 860, 862). The record supports the findings of the Surrogate underlying her assessment of appellant’s services. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

In re the Estate of Mettler, 283 A.D.2d 343, 724 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

283 A.D.2d 343 (In re the Estate of Mettler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related