In re the Estate of McManus

83 A.D.2d 556, 441 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14846
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 6, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 83 A.D.2d 556 (In re the Estate of McManus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of McManus, 83 A.D.2d 556, 441 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

In a proceeding to, inter alia, compel the respondent Joseph M. McManus, Sr., to either (1) purchase the stock of two closely held corporations held by the petitioner as administratrix of the estate of a deceased shareholder, or in the alternative, (2) sell to it a portion of the stock in the two corporations that he has purchased from the estate of a second deceased shareholder so as to equalize their holdings, petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Bloom, S.), dated May 28, 1980, which denied the petition. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Paragraph “seventh” of the amendments to the shareholders’ agreements, which amendments were executed on April 18, 1963, provided: “It is further agreed that upon the sale of stock to the surviving or remaining stockholders whenever such sale shall take place, then the minority stockholders, as of the date of this Agreement, shall have the right to purchase the necessary share or shares of stock to equalize all holdings.” (Emphasis added.) Under the plain language of this paragraph, only the shareholders who were “minority stockholders” at the time the documents were executed were given the right to purchase the necessary share or shares to equalize all holdings. At that time, the three stockholders of the two [557]*557corporations were Leo F. McManus, respondent Joseph M. McManus, Sr., and petitioner’s decedent, Mary F. McManus. If the signatories to these agreements had intended that this right to equalize holdings would pass to the estate of a deceased stockholder, then they would not have limited the operation of this paragraph by including the language limiting the right to equalize to minority stockholders as of the date of the agreements. Lazer, J. P., Margett, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin Enterprises, Inc. v. Janover
140 A.D.2d 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Computer Strategies, Inc. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc.
105 A.D.2d 167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 A.D.2d 556, 441 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-mcmanus-nyappdiv-1981.