In re the Estate of McLaughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of McLaughlin

233 A.D. 850

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Nassau county directing defendant Hannan to render and file an account reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, payable out of the estate, and petition dismissed, with ten dollars costs. The action brought by appellant in the Supreme Court antedated this proceeding, and the surrogate, therefore, should not have assumed jurisdiction. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Nassau county directing defendant Hannan to render and file an account reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, payable out of the estate, and petition dismissed, with ten dollars costs. The action brought by appellant in the Supreme Court antedated this proceeding, and the surrogate, therefore, should not have assumed jurisdiction. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

In re the Estate of McLaughlin, 233 A.D. 850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

233 A.D. 850 (In re the Estate of McLaughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related