In re the Estate of Maynard

37 Misc. 2d 184, 234 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2436
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedOctober 22, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 37 Misc. 2d 184 (In re the Estate of Maynard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Maynard, 37 Misc. 2d 184, 234 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2436 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1962).

Opinion

Joseph A. Cox, S.

In this proceeding for leave to compromise a cause of action for wrongful death, to remove restrictions from the limited letters and to settle the account of the administratrix, the reasonable compensation of the attorney for petitioner is fixed and allowed in the amount requested, in accordance with the Appellate Division Eules, and disbursements are allowed as requested.

The Department of Welfare asserts a lien for payments made to decedent but the funds recovered from a wrongful death action are not general assets of the estate and are not subject to the claims of creditors except to the limited extent provided by section 133 of the Decedent Estate Law. This claim may not be satisfied by the administratrix from the funds accounted for in this proceeding (Baldwin v. Powell, 294 N. Y. 130, 134; Stuber v. McEntee, 142 N. Y. 200; Matter of Schwabacher v. International Salt Co., 272 App. Div. 173).

The Department of Welfare also asserts a claim for payments made to a distributee of the decedent but, as a creditor of a distributee, the claimant has no status in this proceeding (Matter of Riegel, 165 Misc. 265; Matter of Witt, 141 N. Y. S. 179; Matter of Stevenson, 147 N. Y. S. 2d 477; Matter of Edelmuth, 265 App. Div. 20, affd. 290 N. Y. 570).

The claims of the Department of Welfare are disallowed.

The State Insurance Fund claims the entire net recovery herein for payments made to decedent’s dependents pending the outcome of a third-party action. Under subdivision 1 of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, this claimant has a lien which exceeds the net recovery herein, after payment of attorney’s fees and expenses, and therefore the net recovery is payable to the State Insurance Fund.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Hirshfeld v. Islamic Republic of Iran
330 F. Supp. 3d 107 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Peter v. Shao Chi Yu
173 Misc. 2d 911 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
In re the Estate of Lainez
79 A.D.2d 78 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
In re the Estate of Rios
84 Misc. 2d 437 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1975)
In re the Estate of Jackson
71 Misc. 2d 133 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1972)
In re the Estate of Perez
69 Misc. 2d 538 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Misc. 2d 184, 234 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-maynard-nysurct-1962.