In re the Estate of Markuson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Markuson

40 A.D.2d 696, 336 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3761

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 696 (In re the Estate of Markuson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Markuson, 40 A.D.2d 696, 336 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a probate proceeding, objeetant Richard D. Markuson appeals (1) from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, dated December 6,1971 and made after a nonjury trial, which inter alia admitted the will to probate, and (2) from so much of an order of the same court, dated October 1, 1971, as in part denied his motion to amend his objections. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from and decree affirmed. No opinion. A single bill of costs is awarded to petitoner-respondent, payable out of the estate. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello and Christ, JJ., concur; Munder and Benjamin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the decree and to reverse the order insofar as appealed from, to grant the subject amendments to the objections and to grant a new trial, in the interests of justice, with the following memorandum: The amendments to the objections to probate should have been allowed in order to make possible a full development of the proof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a probate proceeding, objeetant Richard D. Markuson appeals (1) from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, dated December 6,1971 and made after a nonjury trial, which inter alia admitted the will to probate, and (2) from so much of an order of the same court, dated October 1, 1971, as in part denied his motion to amend his objections. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from and decree affirmed. No opinion. A single bill of costs is awarded to petitoner-respondent, payable out of the estate. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello and Christ, JJ., concur; Munder and Benjamin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the decree and to reverse the order insofar as appealed from, to grant the subject amendments to the objections and to grant a new trial, in the interests of justice, with the following memorandum: The amendments to the objections to probate should have been allowed in order to make possible a full development of the proof.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 696, 336 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-markuson-nyappdiv-1972.