In re the Estate of Marks

342 A.2d 225, 134 N.J. Super. 510, 1975 N.J. Super. LEXIS 782
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided May 27, 1975·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Hudson County Court, Probate Division, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin.

We also conclude that the trial court properly denied plaintiff’s application for counsel fees to be assessed against $23,008.12 held in escrow pending the court’s decision. The action brought by plaintiff was solely to advance his own interests. The money held in escrow was not a fund in court within contemplation of R. 4:42-9 (a) (2). See Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. Belk, 33 N. J. 162 (1960); Shilowitz v. Shilowitz, 115 N. J. Super. 165, 188 (Ch. Div. 1971), mod. on other grounds, 119 N. J. Super. 311 (App. Div. 1972), certif. den. 62 N. J. 72 (1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Marks, 342 A.2d 225, 134 N.J. Super. 510, 1975 N.J. Super. LEXIS 782 (N.J. Ct. App. 1975).

342 A.2d 225 (In re the Estate of Marks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Rankin
404 A.2d 1200 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)