In re the Estate of Ludlam

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate of Ludlam

35 Misc. 2d 160, 230 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2937

DecidedJuly 11, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 2d 160 (In re the Estate of Ludlam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Ludlam, 35 Misc. 2d 160, 230 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2937 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

John D. Bennett, S.

In this proceeding for advice and direction as to the propriety, price and manner of sale of the real property described in the petition, Elrena Schoelles, by answer, has requested this court to direct distribution to her of the proceeds of the sale as part of her distributive share in this estate. Without consideration of the merits, and without prejudice to Elrena Schoelles commencing a proper proceeding for this relief, the court in its discretion denies her request at this time. Such an application by way of an answer in this proceeding under section 215 of the Surrogate’s Court Act may tend to confuse issues and to delay the orderly process of disposing of the real property, pursuant to the provisions of section 215.

No order need be settled hereon unless one of the parties so desires, in which event said order shall be settled on five days’ notice, with three additional days if service is made by mail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John D. Bennett, S.

In this proceeding for advice and direction as to the propriety, price and manner of sale of the real property described in the petition, Elrena Schoelles, by answer, has requested this court to direct distribution to her of the proceeds of the sale as part of her distributive share in this estate. Without consideration of the merits, and without prejudice to Elrena Schoelles commencing a proper proceeding for this relief, the court in its discretion denies her request at this time. Such an application by way of an answer in this proceeding under section 215 of the Surrogate’s Court Act may tend to confuse issues and to delay the orderly process of disposing of the real property, pursuant to the provisions of section 215.

No order need be settled hereon unless one of the parties so desires, in which event said order shall be settled on five days’ notice, with three additional days if service is made by mail.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 2d 160, 230 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-ludlam-nysurct-1962.