In re the Estate of Locke

123 Misc. 291, 204 N.Y.S. 271, 1923 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1471
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided July 24, 1923·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Foley, S.

The grounds of this appeal of the executors from the order fixing tax are (1) that the preferred and common stock of the' Locke & Clarke Company were overvalued; (2) that the amount allowed by the appraiser as a deduction for commissions was erroneous.

The stock of the corporation is closely held. Its value must, therefore, be ascertained from the books of the corporation. It cannot be determined by a comparison with quotations or prices paid for stock sold in the open market. The appraiser has followed the principles established by the decisions for the valuation of stock of this character, including the good will. Matter of Seaich, 170 App. Div. 688; affd., 219 N. Y. 634; Von Au v. Magenheimer, 126 [292] App. Div. 257; Matter of Ball, 161 id. 79; Matter of Flurscheim, 107 Misc. Rep. 470. The appeal on this ground is denied. It appears from an affidavit submitted to the appraiser "that the assets of decedent’s estate exceed the sum of $100,000. Each of the three executors is, therefore, entitled to full commissions. Matter of Van Pelt, 63 Misc. Rep. 616, 617. The executors are entitled to commissions on the value of the stock of the Locke & Clarke Company, for their duties in respect to this property are executorial. Matter of Fisher, 93 App. Div. 186.

Submit order on notice modifying order fixing tax in accordance with this decision.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Locke, 123 Misc. 291, 204 N.Y.S. 271, 1923 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1471 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1923).

123 Misc. 291 (In re the Estate of Locke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Lane
55 Misc. 2d 88 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1967)
In re the Estate of Marshall
123 Misc. 290 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1924)