In re the Estate of Livingston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Livingston

17 A.D.2d 782, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7784

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 782 (In re the Estate of Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Livingston, 17 A.D.2d 782, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on March 21, 1962, denying petitioner’s application for the appointment here of a committee of his estate, and order, entered on April 5, 1962, dismissing the petition herein, unanimously affirmed, without costs, upon the law and the facts. In view of the statements made in open court and the affirmance of the dismissal of the companion proceeding to vacate the appointment of the ancillary committee, we do not deem it necessary or advisable that we pass upon the merits of the application here. This determination is, of course, without prejudice to the pending proceeding in the Probate Court in Connecticut and without prejudice to such other or further proceedings as may be properly instituted here or in Connecticut. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on March 21, 1962, denying petitioner’s application for the appointment here of a committee of his estate, and order, entered on April 5, 1962, dismissing the petition herein, unanimously affirmed, without costs, upon the law and the facts. In view of the statements made in open court and the affirmance of the dismissal of the companion proceeding to vacate the appointment of the ancillary committee, we do not deem it necessary or advisable that we pass upon the merits of the application here. This determination is, of course, without prejudice to the pending proceeding in the Probate Court in Connecticut and without prejudice to such other or further proceedings as may be properly instituted here or in Connecticut. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 782, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-livingston-nyappdiv-1962.