In re the Estate of Libertini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Libertini

280 A.D.2d 669, 720 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 280 A.D.2d 669 (In re the Estate of Libertini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Libertini, 280 A.D.2d 669, 720 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding to revoke letters of administration, Irene M. Libertini appeals from (1) a decision of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated October 25, 1999, and (2) a decree of the same court dated December 8, 1999.

[670]*670Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see, Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the decree is affirmed for reasons stated by Surrogate Radigan at the Surrogate’s Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the objectants-respondents are awarded one bill of costs, payable by the appellant personally. Krausman, J. P., S. Miller, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding to revoke letters of administration, Irene M. Libertini appeals from (1) a decision of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated October 25, 1999, and (2) a decree of the same court dated December 8, 1999.

[670]*670Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see, Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the decree is affirmed for reasons stated by Surrogate Radigan at the Surrogate’s Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the objectants-respondents are awarded one bill of costs, payable by the appellant personally. Krausman, J. P., S. Miller, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 669, 720 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-libertini-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack