In re the Estate of Leopold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Leopold

264 A.D.2d 777, 696 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9157

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 20, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D.2d 777 (In re the Estate of Leopold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Leopold, 264 A.D.2d 777, 696 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2110 to determine the compensation for legal services rendered in connection with the representation of Stacy M. Leopold as preliminary executor of the estate of Marvin Leopold, Stacy M. Leopold as preliminary executor appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County (Prudenti, S.), entered June 17, 1998, which denied her motion to seal the petition and supporting papers or to permanently remove the petition and supporting papers from the court file.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Surrogate’s Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant’s motion which sought to [778]*778permanently remove the petition and supporting papers from the court file (see, 22 NYCRR 207.8). The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2110 to determine the compensation for legal services rendered in connection with the representation of Stacy M. Leopold as preliminary executor of the estate of Marvin Leopold, Stacy M. Leopold as preliminary executor appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County (Prudenti, S.), entered June 17, 1998, which denied her motion to seal the petition and supporting papers or to permanently remove the petition and supporting papers from the court file.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Surrogate’s Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant’s motion which sought to [778]*778permanently remove the petition and supporting papers from the court file (see, 22 NYCRR 207.8). The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D.2d 777, 696 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-leopold-nyappdiv-1999.