In re the Estate of Lehman

72 Misc. 2d 495, 340 N.Y.S.2d 418, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1748
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedJune 23, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 72 Misc. 2d 495 (In re the Estate of Lehman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Lehman, 72 Misc. 2d 495, 340 N.Y.S.2d 418, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1748 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1966).

Opinion

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

This is an application by beneficiaries whose shares were deposited in court under section 269-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act, to withdraw the respective sums on deposit and to have them transmitted through the purchase of certificates or credits of Tuzex Foreign Trade Organization in Prague, Czechoslovakia. This application and 10 similar applications were presented to the court upon a single record. The respondents are the Public Administrator, the fiduciaries in certain pending administrations and, in one case, the Attorney-General of the State of New York. The question in each case is whether the respective beneficiaries will have the benefit, use and control of funds transmitted to them in the form of Tuzex certificates.

In Matter of Reidl (23 A D 2d 171), the Appellate Division considered an application by beneficiaries for the transmission of funds to them through the program of the Tuzex Foreign Trade Organization. Reversing the Surrogate, the Appellate Division held (p. 172) “ that the proof shows that this program provides a reasonable assurance that legacies to Czechoslovak residents will reach the beneficiaries. It was further established that the United States Government has placed no restrictions on the purchase of such certificates for use of estate legatees in Czechoslovakia ”. The Appellate Division also said: When the Surrogate should use his discretion to apply the section [269-a] depends on the proof before him.”

Tuzex Foreign Trade Organization is a foreign trade enterprise established by the Government of Czechoslovakia for the retail sale of goods for foreign currencies. The lawful currency in Czechoslovakia is the Czechoslovak crown, which is an internal, nonconvertible currency. The corporation which that government has set up for the sale of goods for foreign currencies is somewhat similar to those established in other countries which [496]*496have a similar economic system. This court has heretofore considered the Bulgarian State enterprise known as Corecom (Matter of Petroff, 49 Misc 2d 233). The basic objectives of both enterprises are similar but that referred to in the cited case had many differences from the one in the present case and had some greater advantages to the beneficiaries. However, in both cases it appears that the purpose is to obtain foreign currency and in pursuit of that ¡objective nationals with foreign currency are given opportunities to purchase scarce goods or goods not available generally, at prices that are attractive.

In the pending cases, it has been established that a beneficiary of an estate being administered in the United States may use the entire amount of his distributive share for the purchase of Tuzex certificates or Tuzex accounts, without any limitation as to amount, and that he may withdraw any sums without limitation of amount. It appears that in the past there was a percentage limitation on the amount that could be converted into this form of credit, and, in addition to the percentage limitation there was an absolute ceiling. Moreover, not more than 5,000 Tuzex crowns could be used in any one year. That limitation would amount to approximately $800. It is conceded that all of these limitations have been removed insofar as United States estates are concerned. There are no taxes or duties levied on Tuzex certificates.

Several catalogues which describe goods and prices have been introduced in evidence. The prices are generally reasonable for the goods so listed. It may be that some prices are higher than current prices in this country for similar articles but others are lower than prices here. The difference in prices may reflect scarcities or transportation costs. The testimony was that the prices generally on articles in the Tuzex stores are 2% or 3 times less than similar articles would command on the regular markets.

Tuzex certificates have a time limit which is printed on the face of each certificate. The time limit is usually six months. However, it appears that the time for use of the credit can be extended by an exchange for new certificates or by deposit in a Tuzex account from which later certificates can be withdrawn. Obviously time limitations on the use of the certificates — and indeed the entire program — will depend upon the consent of the government, but there is no basis in the present record for finding that existing practices will not continue.

Unlike the certificates in Matter of Petroff (49 Misc 2d 233, supra), the holder of Tuzex certificates cannot sell a certificate or his interest in a Tuzex account. The certificates can be used only for the purchase of merchandise in Tuzex stores. One who [497]*497purchases merchandise may sell it to another, provided that he is not engaged in the conduct of business without a license. Presumably this means that he might sell articles sporadically, but could not engage in that practice with any regularity. Again, unlike Matter of Petroff {supra), the accounts in Tuzex are not maintained in American dollars and purchases are not made in dollars, although the dollar equivalents are shown in the catalogues. The national holds what has been characterized in the record as Tuzex crowns. One of the catalogues states: ‘ ‘ Prices are quoted in Czechoslovak crowns and American dollars at the rate of exchange valid on the day of the publication of the price list and are understood to apply to the purchases of goods in the Tuzex sales rooms. Goods are sold for foreign currencies enumerated in the list of quotations for purchasing foreign currencies of the * * * (State Bank of Czechoslovakia). Conversion is made at the rate of exchange valid on the day of payment. Changes in prices are reserved.” The prices given in crowns patently mean only Tuzex crowns because the merchandise cannot be purchased by general public with the internal currency.

The rate of exchange is controlled by the government. It appears that at present the rate of exchange is 7.17 to 7.18 Czechoslovak crowns to the dollar. A beneficiary entitled to a legacy or share in dollars may elect to convert it to Czechoslovak crowns or into Tuzex crowns. If he converts into Tuzex certificates’ he receives crowns at the official rate of exchange. If he elects to convert into Czechoslovak crowns he will receive a 100% bonus, that is, 14.34 crowns instead of 7.17. There is no legal open market for the purchase of Czechoslovak crowns. Purchase of dollars in limited amounts may be made in Czechoslovakia by persons who are authorized to travel to the United States. Other purchases of crowns would have to be made on the so-called “black market,” if one exists. There was testimony that in the conversion of dollars and crowns in the very limited amounts that can be purchased from official agencies for travel abroad or that may be procured from sources not lawfully authorized, the rate of exchange would vary from 35 to 37 crowns to the dollar. There is thus a disparity between what could be received from the State bank (approximately 14.35 crowns) what might be received in the so-called illegal markets (approximately 36 crowns) and what would be received in the conversion to Tuzex crowns (approximately 7.17 or 7.18). The lower rate on the Tuzex crowns is said to be offset by the low prices in the Tuzex stores and to make them more attractive than the regular crowns even with the 100% bonus.

[498]*498One who elects to take the sum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Kosek
294 N.E.2d 188 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 Misc. 2d 495, 340 N.Y.S.2d 418, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-lehman-nysurct-1966.