In re the Estate of Lavigne
This text of 420 N.E.2d 92 (In re the Estate of Lavigne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
It cannot be said that the Appellate Division erred in finding that testator’s obliteration of his will was accompanied by the requisite intent to revoke (see Matter of Bonner, 17 NY2d 9). Such revocation by physical act of the testator revokes the will in its entirety, and therefore the will should not have been admitted to probate (EPTL 3-4.1, subd [a], par [2], subpar [A], cl [i]).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 N.E.2d 92, 52 N.Y.2d 1008, 438 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-lavigne-ny-1981.