In re the Estate of Lavigne

420 N.E.2d 92, 52 N.Y.2d 1008, 438 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2239
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 19, 1981·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

It cannot be said that the Appellate Division erred in finding that testator’s obliteration of his will was accompanied by the requisite intent to revoke (see Matter of Bonner, 17 NY2d 9). Such revocation by physical act of the testator revokes the will in its entirety, and therefore the will should not have been admitted to probate (EPTL 3-4.1, subd [a], par [2], subpar [A], cl [i]).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Lavigne, 420 N.E.2d 92, 52 N.Y.2d 1008, 438 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2239 (N.Y. 1981).

420 N.E.2d 92 (In re the Estate of Lavigne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Christensen
94 A.D.2d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
In re the Estate of Collins
117 Misc. 2d 669 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1982)