In Re the Estate of Kuhn

172 A. 513, 116 N.J. Eq. 94, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 687
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 4, 1934·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Ordinary Fielder in the prerogative court.

*101 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tkenchaed, Paekeb, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Estate of Kuhn, 172 A. 513, 116 N.J. Eq. 94, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 687 (N.J. 1934).

172 A. 513 (In Re the Estate of Kuhn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.