In re the Estate of Kopp

102 Misc. 506
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 Misc. 506 (In re the Estate of Kopp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Kopp, 102 Misc. 506 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1918).

Opinion

Fowler, S.

The comptroller of the state of California has filed objections to the account of the admin[507]*507istratrix de bonis non on the ground that it does not provide for payment of the sum of $4,320 alleged to be due him for inheritance tax assessed upon the estate of the decedent by the state of California.

In a proceeding heretofore brought to settle the account of the deceased executor of decedent’s estate similar objections were filed by the comptroller of the state of California, and the referee appointed by this court to hear and determine the questions raised by the objections reported that the validity of the claim of the comptroller of the state of California was not then before him, and the decree entered upon the report of the referee provided that the comptroller of the state of California should pay to the administratrix the sum of $142.65, costs and disbursements. This sum has not been paid. The administratrix de bonis non now asks that the comptroller of the state of California give security for any costs that may be awarded against him in the proceeding to determine the validity of the claim presented by the objections which he has again filed. Ordinarily this court would hesitate to direct an officer of a foreign state to give security for costs, but the fact that the costs which were heretofore awarded against the comptroller of the state of California have not been paid indicates that there is some reluctance on the part of that official to comply with the decree of this court, and as the administratrix de bonis non should not be put to the inconvenience and expense of going to California to enforce payment of costs awarded by this court I think that the comptroller of the state of California should give security for costs.

Application granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Probate of the Will of Bray
182 Misc. 623 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 Misc. 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-kopp-nysurct-1918.