In re the Estate of Kempf

Michigan Supreme Court

In re the Estate of Kempf

19 N.W. 31, 53 Mich. 350, 1884 Mich. LEXIS 684

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 16, 1884

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 19 N.W. 31 (In re the Estate of Kempf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Kempf, 19 N.W. 31, 53 Mich. 350, 1884 Mich. LEXIS 684 (Mich. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, J.

Appellant, as executor of Frederick Kempf, deceased, contributed from the funds of the estate $175 towards enabling the widow to erect a monument at an expense of $300. The children by a former marriage, who are residuary legatees, opposed this allowance when the executor’s account came up for settlement, and the probate court threw out this item. The circuit court allowed $100, but no more. The executor now appeals to this Court.

We think there can be no question of the propriety of allowing the honest payment by an executor for such a monument as is suitable to the condition of the estate and desired by the widow. A large part of the community look upon such memorials as fit and proper, and they are, •within proper limits, as suitable as funeral expenses, and much more suitable than much of the funeral pomp on which money is freely expended. If a tombstone is put up, there is no reason why it should not be as neat and decent as the estate fairly warrants; and in the present case, being done by the desire of the widow, and not at all beyond the means of the estate, the whole claim should have been allowed.

It must be certified to the circuit court that the item should be allowed in full, and the executor will be allowed his costs of these proceedings.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, J.

Appellant, as executor of Frederick Kempf, deceased, contributed from the funds of the estate $175 towards enabling the widow to erect a monument at an expense of $300. The children by a former marriage, who are residuary legatees, opposed this allowance when the executor’s account came up for settlement, and the probate court threw out this item. The circuit court allowed $100, but no more. The executor now appeals to this Court.

We think there can be no question of the propriety of allowing the honest payment by an executor for such a monument as is suitable to the condition of the estate and desired by the widow. A large part of the community look upon such memorials as fit and proper, and they are, •within proper limits, as suitable as funeral expenses, and much more suitable than much of the funeral pomp on which money is freely expended. If a tombstone is put up, there is no reason why it should not be as neat and decent as the estate fairly warrants; and in the present case, being done by the desire of the widow, and not at all beyond the means of the estate, the whole claim should have been allowed.

It must be certified to the circuit court that the item should be allowed in full, and the executor will be allowed his costs of these proceedings.

The other Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 N.W. 31, 53 Mich. 350, 1884 Mich. LEXIS 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-kempf-mich-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack