In re the Estate of Jordan

89 A.D.3d 1085, 933 N.Y.2d 593
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 2011·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SCPA 1001, which sets forth the priority for the issuance of letters of administration, unequivocally provides that the surviving spouse has priority over all other distributees of the intestate (see SCPA 1001 [1] [a]). Accordingly, the Surrogate’s Court properly denied the appellant’s petition for the issuance of letters of administration and granted the cross petition of Lenna Susannah Jordan for the issuance of permanent letters of administration to her, as the surviving spouse, and to revoke temporary letters of administration previously issued to the appellant (see Matter of Morris, 69 AD3d 635, 636 [2010]).

[1086]*1086The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see SCPA 711, 719, 1001 [1] [a]). Rivera, J.R, Leventhal, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Jordan, 89 A.D.3d 1085, 933 N.Y.2d 593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

89 A.D.3d 1085 (In re the Estate of Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Pilapil
2019 NY Slip Op 3790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Dinger
2017 NY Slip Op 4115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Jordan v. Metropolitan Jewish Hospice
122 A.D.3d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Jordan v. Jordan
120 A.D.3d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)