In re the Estate of Jordan
This text of 89 A.D.3d 1085 (In re the Estate of Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SCPA 1001, which sets forth the priority for the issuance of letters of administration, unequivocally provides that the surviving spouse has priority over all other distributees of the intestate (see SCPA 1001 [1] [a]). Accordingly, the Surrogate’s Court properly denied the appellant’s petition for the issuance of letters of administration and granted the cross petition of Lenna Susannah Jordan for the issuance of permanent letters of administration to her, as the surviving spouse, and to revoke temporary letters of administration previously issued to the appellant (see Matter of Morris, 69 AD3d 635, 636 [2010]).
[1086]*1086The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see SCPA 711, 719, 1001 [1] [a]). Rivera, J.R, Leventhal, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.3d 1085, 933 N.Y.2d 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-jordan-nyappdiv-2011.