in Re: the Estate of Jeanne Stahl
This text of in Re: the Estate of Jeanne Stahl (in Re: the Estate of Jeanne Stahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-09-00245-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE THE ESTATE OF JEANNE STAHL
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
Relators, the Estate of Jeanne Stahl, Deceased, David Stahl, Debra Stahl
McFarland, and Richard Stahl (collectively referred to as the “Stahls”), have filed a
petition for writ of mandamus by which they request this Court to direct respondent,
the Honorable John B. Martinez, presiding judge of the County Court at Law No. 3 of
1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) ("W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is n ot required to do so."); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W h e n d e n yin g relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinion but is not req uired to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). Nueces County, Texas, to preclude the admission of evidence relating to certain
events that transpired (1) before Jeanne Stahl was admitted into the hospital, and (2)
after her death. The real parties in interest are Bay Area Healthcare Group, Ltd., d/b/a
Corpus Christi Medical Center and Bay Area Medical Center (collectively referred to as
“Bay Area”). This Court requested a response from the real parties in interest and one
was timely filed.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus and the response, is of the opinion that the Stahls have not shown
themselves entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should
be denied. See T EX . R. A PP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus
is DENIED.
P ER C URIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed on the 8th day of July, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: the Estate of Jeanne Stahl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-jeanne-stahl-texapp-2009.