In Re: The Estate of James Clifford Smith - Concurring
This text of In Re: The Estate of James Clifford Smith - Concurring (In Re: The Estate of James Clifford Smith - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 24, 2006 Session
IN RE: THE ESTATE OF JAMES CLIFFORD SMITH
Probate Court for Sumner County No. 2004P-12 Tom E. Gray, Chancellor
No. M2005-01410-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 1, 2006
WILLIAM C. KOCH , JR., P.J., M.S., concurring.
When read together, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1396p(b)(4)(B) (West 2003) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 71- 5-116(c) (2004) plainly permit the State of Tennessee to recover correctly paid medical assistance benefits from the estate of a recipient’s surviving spouse. However, I concur with the court’s conclusion that the property from which these benefits can be recovered is limited to property owned by the recipient at the time of his or her death that passed to the surviving spouse “through joint tenancy, tenancy in common, survivorship, life estate, living trust, or other arrangement.”
The parties have stipulated that Mr. and Mrs. Smith sold their home in May 1999 and placed the proceeds in various joint accounts. They have also stipulated that Mrs. Smith had lawfully transferred her interest in all but approximately $2,000 of the these assets to Mr. Smith before she died. Based on this stipulation, the bulk of the assets once jointly owned by Mr. and Mrs. Smith are no longer subject to the State’s recovery claim because Mrs. Smith did not own an interest in them when she died.
____________________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., P.J., M.S.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: The Estate of James Clifford Smith - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-james-clifford-smith-concurrin-tennctapp-2006.