In re the Estate of Jacobs

157 Misc. 305, 283 N.Y.S. 275, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1543
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Estate of Jacobs. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 Misc. 139
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided May 16, 1935·Published

Opinion

Delehanty, S.

The application to resettle an order heretofore entered is denied. The court is of opinion that the provisions of section 44 of the State Finance Law and section 136 of the Civil Practice Act do not require the payment of interest by the city on funds deposited with the chamberlain by the public administrator. The subject of interest on funds so deposited is specifically provided for by section 29 of chapter 230 of the Laws of 1898 and the city is specifically relieved thereby from liability for interest. (Matter of People v. Maltbie, 102 Misc. 575, at p. 583; affd., 184 App. Div. 743; affd., 226 N. Y. 641.) The recent decision of Matter of Schmidt v. Chamberlain of N. Y. (266 N. Y. 225) relates to funds originating out of a sale of real property of an infant pursuant to a judgment of the Supreme Court and hence is not applicable to the problem. Submit, on notice, order denying the motion to resettle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Jacobs, 157 Misc. 305, 283 N.Y.S. 275, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1543 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1935).

157 Misc. 305 (In re the Estate of Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of People v. . Maltbie
123 N.E. 882 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Matter of Schmidt v. Chamberlain of N.Y.
194 N.E. 685 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
In re People
184 A.D. 743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
In re People
102 Misc. 575 (New York Supreme Court, 1918)