In re the Estate of Jackson

18 A.D.2d 751, 235 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6200
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 28, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 751 (In re the Estate of Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Jackson, 18 A.D.2d 751, 235 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

This is an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Sullivan County, which granted ancillary letters upon an approved bond of $5,000. The appellant argues that the Surrogate exceeded his discretion in not requiring more than $5,000 as requested in his affidavit answering the petition of respondents for ancillary letters. The petitioners in their petition admit assets in New York State, Sullivan County, of about $106,000, of which $75,000 was real property within the county. Appellant has claimed damages by decedent to him in the sum of $50,000 as the result of an alleged conspiracy entered into between decedent and Brookwood Camp, Inc., to discharge sewage in the waters of Loch Ada and breach of covenant against incumbrances by decedent. He further seeks treble damages pursuant to section 1433 of the Penal Law. So far as appears it is undisputed that appellant is indebted to decedent's estate in the sum of $20,675. The Surrogate concluded that the disputed claim could not be ignored. (Matter of Musgrave, 5 Dem. 427, 428.) Appellant, however, has not set forth sufficient facts in his affidavit to show an enforeible claim in the amount alleged. The amount required by the Surrogate when added to the mortgage indebtedness is about $25,675 and this court cannot say that such is an abuse of discretion on the part of the Surrogate under section 163 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, J J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Whitney
57 A.D.3d 1142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.2d 751, 235 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-jackson-nyappdiv-1962.