In re the Estate of Hynson

35 Misc. 2d 73, 229 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2935
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided July 11, 1962·Published

Opinion

John D. Bennett, 8.

This is a proceeding to compel the payment of funeral expenses.

[74] Both the Industrial Commissioner’s claim for unpaid unemployment insurance taxes incurred by the decedent’s business durmg its operation by the administrator and the attorneys’ fee are administration expenses and as such have priority over the petitioner’s claim (Matter of McClatchey, 170 Misc. 696, 700 and cases there cited).

Since it does not appear at this time that subsequent to the payment of administration expenses there will be estate funds which are applicable to the payment of funeral expenses, the petitioner’s claim is directed to be heard on the judicial settlement of the administrator’s account and the present petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Hynson, 35 Misc. 2d 73, 229 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2935 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1962).

35 Misc. 2d 73 (In re the Estate of Hynson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of McClatchey
170 Misc. 696 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)