In re the Estate of Hunter

290 A.D.2d 555, 736 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 737

This text of 290 A.D.2d 555 (In re the Estate of Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Hunter, 290 A.D.2d 555, 736 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In a proceeding to settle the first intermediate account of the petitioner as cotrustee of a testamentary trust, the appellant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Emanuelli, S.), dated July 19, 2000, as, upon granting her motion, in effect, for leave to reargue a prior motion, denied her motion to withdraw a “waiver of citation and consent in accounting” to vacate a decree of the same court dated February 23, 1998, judicially settling the account, and to file objections to the account based on the alleged mismanagement of the assets of the trust.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

This appeal arises from the execution of a waiver of citation and consent in accounting (hereinafter the waiver), by the appellant, a beneficiary of a trust created under the will of her deceased grandmother, in connection with the intermediate accounting of the petitioner trustee.

The appellant claims, inter alia, that the Surrogate’s Court erred in denying her motion to withdraw the waiver on the grounds of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. Contrary to the appellant’s contention, upon, in effect, granting reargument, [556]*556the Surrogate’s Court properly denied the motion, and directed that a fact-finding hearing be held to determine whether the events surrounding the appellant’s review and signing of the waiver were fair, open, and free of any misrepresentation or other misconduct (see, Matter of Paul, 105 AD2d 928, 930). Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Paul
105 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 A.D.2d 555, 736 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-hunter-nyappdiv-2002.