In re the Estate of Hoppenfeld

224 A.D.2d 323, 638 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1313

This text of 224 A.D.2d 323 (In re the Estate of Hoppenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Hoppenfeld, 224 A.D.2d 323, 638 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1313 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[324]*324—Order and decree, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Renee Roth, S.), entered on or about September 29, 1994 and November 1, 1994, respectively, unanimously affirmed, for the reasons stated by Roth, S., without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 323, 638 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-hoppenfeld-nyappdiv-1996.