In re the Estate of Hoppenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Hoppenfeld

170 A.D.2d 390

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.D.2d 390 (In re the Estate of Hoppenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Hoppenfeld, 170 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Renee Roth, S.), entered on or about November 28, 1989, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Renee Roth, S., without costs. Motion by respondent-appellant to strike the reply brief is denied. Cross-motion by petitioner-respondent for counsel fees and other related relief is denied.

No opinion. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Renee Roth, S.), entered on or about November 28, 1989, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Renee Roth, S., without costs. Motion by respondent-appellant to strike the reply brief is denied. Cross-motion by petitioner-respondent for counsel fees and other related relief is denied.

No opinion. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.D.2d 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-hoppenfeld-nyappdiv-1991.