In re the Estate of Hirnschall

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate of Hirnschall

147 Misc. 897, 265 N.Y.S. 36, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1576

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedMay 19, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 Misc. 897 (In re the Estate of Hirnschall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Hirnschall, 147 Misc. 897, 265 N.Y.S. 36, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1576 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Delehanty, S.

The claim for accrued installments of temporary alimony is disallowed. Under the authorities it is of no importance whether the claim therefor had been reduced to judgment before or after the death of deceased since all liability for alimony (whether accrued or not) terminates at the death of the husband. (Faversham v. Faversham, 161 App. Div. 521; White v. White, 224 id. 355.) The purported judgment was entered after the actual death of deceased and is wholly ineffectual. The questions remaining open under the objections will be heard on May 23, 1933, at two-thirty R. M. In respect of the objection that the accounting party is not the widow of deceased, objectants will be required to show upon the hearing date wherein they are interested in her status. The proof outlined by objectants is to the effect that another living person is the actual widow of deceased. That person, by an agreement approved by this court, has transferred all her interests in the estate [898]*898to the accounting party. If any widow in fact survives (whether the accounting party or the person named by objecbants), the interests or shares of objectants are as reported in the account and will so remain, unaffected by any determination as to who is the widow.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delehanty, S.

The claim for accrued installments of temporary alimony is disallowed. Under the authorities it is of no importance whether the claim therefor had been reduced to judgment before or after the death of deceased since all liability for alimony (whether accrued or not) terminates at the death of the husband. (Faversham v. Faversham, 161 App. Div. 521; White v. White, 224 id. 355.) The purported judgment was entered after the actual death of deceased and is wholly ineffectual. The questions remaining open under the objections will be heard on May 23, 1933, at two-thirty R. M. In respect of the objection that the accounting party is not the widow of deceased, objectants will be required to show upon the hearing date wherein they are interested in her status. The proof outlined by objectants is to the effect that another living person is the actual widow of deceased. That person, by an agreement approved by this court, has transferred all her interests in the estate [898]*898to the accounting party. If any widow in fact survives (whether the accounting party or the person named by objecbants), the interests or shares of objectants are as reported in the account and will so remain, unaffected by any determination as to who is the widow.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 Misc. 897, 265 N.Y.S. 36, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-hirnschall-nysurct-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack