In re the estate of Hibbler

81 A. 1133, 79 N.J. Eq. 230, 9 Buchanan 230, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 331
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 20, 1911·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons stated [231] in the opinion delivered in the court below by Vice-Ordinary Walker.

For afir-manco—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White—9. For reversal—Parker, Bergen, Voorhees—3!

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the estate of Hibbler, 81 A. 1133, 79 N.J. Eq. 230, 9 Buchanan 230, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 331 (N.J. 1911).

81 A. 1133 (In re the estate of Hibbler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raynor v. Raynor
726 A.2d 280 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
In Re Armour's Will
166 A.2d 376 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
In Re Estate of Rogers
83 A.2d 268 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
First Camden, Trust v. Hiram Lodge No. 81
35 A.2d 490 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
In Re Thurston
145 A. 110 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1929)
Parker v. Wright
143 A. 870 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)