In re the Estate of Hertz

128 A.D.2d 780, 512 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44465
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 1987·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In an accounting proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.), dated December 11, 1985, which, inter alia, directed that the executor pay part of the attorney’s and accountant’s fees from his commission.

[781]*781Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances herein, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it set aside a settlement of the estate by agreement and ordered that the executor pay a part of the attorney’s and accountant’s fees from his statutory commission (SCPA 2110, 2307; Matter of Schaich, 55 AD2d 914; Matter of Marri, 79 Misc 2d 990). The reimbursed payments were properly determined to be for performance of duties which the executor was legally bound to perform. Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Hertz, 128 A.D.2d 780, 512 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44465 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

128 A.D.2d 780 (In re the Estate of Hertz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stortecky v. Mazzone
156 Misc. 2d 16 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
In re the Estate of Shen
157 A.D.2d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
In re the Estate of Verplanck
151 A.D.2d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re the Estate of Lanyi
147 A.D.2d 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re the Estate of Wolf
147 A.D.2d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re the Estate of Zorek
131 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)