In re the Estate of Herbstman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Herbstman

51 A.D.2d 725, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11204

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 2, 1976·Published

Opinion

In a proceeding to determine the validity of petitioner’s exercise of her right of election, the appeal is from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated April 17, 1975, which, inter alia, held (1) that petitioner had not waived her right of election and (2) that she is entitled to one half of the net estate. Decree affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate, on the opinion of Acting Surrogate Ventiera. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to determine the validity of petitioner’s exercise of her right of election, the appeal is from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated April 17, 1975, which, inter alia, held (1) that petitioner had not waived her right of election and (2) that she is entitled to one half of the net estate. Decree affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate, on the opinion of Acting Surrogate Ventiera. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

In re the Estate of Herbstman, 51 A.D.2d 725, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11204 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

51 A.D.2d 725 (In re the Estate of Herbstman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.