In re the Estate of Hens

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate of Hens

39 Misc. 2d 78, 239 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1963 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2059

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedMay 8, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 Misc. 2d 78 (In re the Estate of Hens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Hens, 39 Misc. 2d 78, 239 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1963 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2059 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

John D. Bennett, S.

In this probate proceeding the decedent by codicil reduced a general legacy in paragraph Second in the original amount of $500 to $50.

The codicil, however, is witnessed by the two petitioners who are the residuary beneficiaries of this estate.

Under section 27 of the Decedent Estate Law, a devise or bequest to a subscribing witness whose testimony is necessary to the probate of an instrument is void.

Since the petitioners are not the subscribing witnesses to the original will, the residuary bequests to them are not invalid under section 27 (Matter of Johnson, 37 Misc. 334),

However, insofar as the petitioners will benefit by the codicil to the extent of increasing the total of their shares by $450, such increased benefit is void, and since there is no other disposition of such sum the decedent must be held to have died intestate as to that amount (Matter of Hunt, 122 N. Y. S. 2d 765, 767).

The propounded instrument, including the codicil, will be admitted to probate as the last will and testament of the testatrix.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI