In re the Estate of Hembury

2 Mills Surr. 532, 37 Misc. 454, 75 N.Y.S. 933
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided March 15, 1902·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Ohuboh, S.

— The question arises as to the extent of the widow’s exemption under section 2713 of the Code, and what amount in cash shall be allowed the widow where the deceased did not leave the specific property referred to in that section.

It appears the appraisers have allowed $200 under subdivision 3 of this section' and $150 under subdivision 5 of this section; this is not objected to, but an allowance of $150 under subdivision 4 is objected to. The object of this statute was to give a special relief to a widow and is entitled to a liberal construction, and where the deceased did not leave the specific articles referred to in the statute then the widow should be entitled to an equivalent in cash. Matter of Williams, 31 App. Div. 617.

Counsel concede this is so, but say that this reasoning does not apply to the articles mentioned in subdivision 4 of this section. I am unable to see the force of this reasoning. The articles referred to in subdivision 4 were not to be taken in the alternative of anything else provided for; on the contrary, if the deceased left the peculiar personal property provided in this section the widow would have received $150 worth of the same in addition to the specific property mentioned in subdivision 3, and the $150 worth of property provided for by subdivision 5.

There being no such specific property she is entitled to the value of the same in cash, viz.: One hundred and fifty dollars.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Hembury, 2 Mills Surr. 532, 37 Misc. 454, 75 N.Y.S. 933 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1902).

2 Mills Surr. 532 (In re the Estate of Hembury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re McClelland
134 Misc. 166 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1929)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Stiles
7 Mills Surr. 290 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1909)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Griffith
5 Mills Surr. 289 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1906)
In re the Estate of Keough
4 Mills Surr. 145 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1904)
In re the Estate of Sprague
4 Mills Surr. 104 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1903)
In re the Accounting of Hulse
4 Mills Surr. 46 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1903)
In re the Estate of Perry
3 Mills Surr. 115 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1902)