In re the estate of Heinze

121 A. 926, 94 N.J. Eq. 505, 9 Stock. 505, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 706
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the estate of Heinze. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 N.J. Eq. 672
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 2, 1923·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Swavze, TrenCHARD;, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk—11.

For reversal—-None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the estate of Heinze, 121 A. 926, 94 N.J. Eq. 505, 9 Stock. 505, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 706 (N.J. 1923).

121 A. 926 (In re the estate of Heinze) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.