In re the Estate of Heim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Heim

255 A.D. 1007, 8 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6245

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1938·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a discovery proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court, Kings county, the decree dismisses the petition and holds that the respondent institution is entitled to the properly in suit. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs against the appellant as administratrix. The proof shows that the respondent has title to the property sought to be recovered by the administratrix, the title existing by reason of an equitable assignment executed by the decedent in her lifetime. In a discovery proceeding it is proper to determine the question of title and make a decree accordingly. (Surr. Ct. Act, §§ 206, 206-a.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [166 Mise. 931.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a discovery proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court, Kings county, the decree dismisses the petition and holds that the respondent institution is entitled to the properly in suit. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs against the appellant as administratrix. The proof shows that the respondent has title to the property sought to be recovered by the administratrix, the title existing by reason of an equitable assignment executed by the decedent in her lifetime. In a discovery proceeding it is proper to determine the question of title and make a decree accordingly. (Surr. Ct. Act, §§ 206, 206-a.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [166 Mise. 931.]

In re the Estate of Heim, 255 A.D. 1007, 8 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 1007 (In re the Estate of Heim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related