In re the Estate of Harkness

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate of Harkness

119 Misc. 361

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1922

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 119 Misc. 361 (In re the Estate of Harkness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Harkness, 119 Misc. 361 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Foley, S.

This is an accounting by John W. MacMiller, one of the executors of decedent, who applies for leave to resign. Joseph B. Loughrey, an alleged creditor, instituted an action in the Supreme Court on April 13, 1921, against the executors in this estate. He has appeared in this proceeding and has demanded “ the trial before a jury in this court of the issues raised by the pleadings in the action in the Supreme Court * * In Matter of Woodward, 105 Misc. Rep. 446; affd., 188 App. Div. 888, Surrogate Fowler denied an application for a trial by jury in such a proceeding. With characteristic erudition and thoroughness he sets forth the origin and history of accounting proceedings, their equitable nature, and he emphasizes the fact that there never has been the right of trial by jury in such matters. See, also, Matter of Stark, 118 Misc. Rep. 240; Matter of Kent, 92 id. 113; affd., with certain modifications, 173 App. Div. 563. Recently, in Matter of Stein, 200 App. Div. 726, the Appellate Division of the fourth department upheld the right to a jury trial of a rejected claim. I prefer to follow the rulings of the Appellate Division of this department. Extraordinary circumstances may justify the grant of such a trial as a matter of discretion. Surrogate’s Court Act, § 68; Matter of Scovill, 218 N. Y. 707. The present application must be denied. Section 211 of the Surrogate’s Court Act provides for the trial upon the accounting when a claim has been filed and rejected. Loughrey never filed a claim with the executors, but elected to bring an action in the Supreme Court. He should proceed with his pending action in that court, if he desires a jury trial. No final distribution can now be ordered and the assets of the estate are ample to satisfy any possible recovery. There is no authority for the trial of the issues in the Surrogate’s Court upon the pleadings in another form. He may file a formal proof of claim setting forth the nature of his demand on or before October 16, 1922, if he elects to have a determination without a jury upon this accounting.

Settle decree on notice accordingly after complying with memorandum for counsel handed down herewith.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foley, S.

This is an accounting by John W. MacMiller, one of the executors of decedent, who applies for leave to resign. Joseph B. Loughrey, an alleged creditor, instituted an action in the Supreme Court on April 13, 1921, against the executors in this estate. He has appeared in this proceeding and has demanded “ the trial before a jury in this court of the issues raised by the pleadings in the action in the Supreme Court * * In Matter of Woodward, 105 Misc. Rep. 446; affd., 188 App. Div. 888, Surrogate Fowler denied an application for a trial by jury in such a proceeding. With characteristic erudition and thoroughness he sets forth the origin and history of accounting proceedings, their equitable nature, and he emphasizes the fact that there never has been the right of trial by jury in such matters. See, also, Matter of Stark, 118 Misc. Rep. 240; Matter of Kent, 92 id. 113; affd., with certain modifications, 173 App. Div. 563. Recently, in Matter of Stein, 200 App. Div. 726, the Appellate Division of the fourth department upheld the right to a jury trial of a rejected claim. I prefer to follow the rulings of the Appellate Division of this department. Extraordinary circumstances may justify the grant of such a trial as a matter of discretion. Surrogate’s Court Act, § 68; Matter of Scovill, 218 N. Y. 707. The present application must be denied. Section 211 of the Surrogate’s Court Act provides for the trial upon the accounting when a claim has been filed and rejected. Loughrey never filed a claim with the executors, but elected to bring an action in the Supreme Court. He should proceed with his pending action in that court, if he desires a jury trial. No final distribution can now be ordered and the assets of the estate are ample to satisfy any possible recovery. There is no authority for the trial of the issues in the Surrogate’s Court upon the pleadings in another form. He may file a formal proof of claim setting forth the nature of his demand on or before October 16, 1922, if he elects to have a determination without a jury upon this accounting.

Settle decree on notice accordingly after complying with memorandum for counsel handed down herewith.

Decreed accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 Misc. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-harkness-nysurct-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack