In re the Estate of Halpern

New York Court of Appeals

In re the Estate of Halpern

944 N.E.2d 1142, 16 N.Y.3d 777

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 22, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by24 cases

This text of 944 N.E.2d 1142 (In re the Estate of Halpern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Halpern, 944 N.E.2d 1142, 16 N.Y.3d 777 (N.Y. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. When viewed in its entirety, the testimony from the attesting witness is insufficient to create a triable issue of fact as to whether decedent’s will was duly executed.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. When viewed in its entirety, the testimony from the attesting witness is insufficient to create a triable issue of fact as to whether decedent’s will was duly executed.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

944 N.E.2d 1142, 16 N.Y.3d 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-halpern-ny-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack