In re the Estate of H. V. D. Van Epps

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate of H. V. D. Van Epps

64 How. Pr. 464

DecidedDecember 15, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 64 How. Pr. 464 (In re the Estate of H. V. D. Van Epps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of H. V. D. Van Epps, 64 How. Pr. 464 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

P. A. Rogers, Surrogate.

The petitioner comes too late-. I must apply the statute of limitations. In addition to the-cases cited by counsel, I know of McCabe agt. McCabe decided by the general term of the supreme court of the third-department, covering the points presented herein by the petition. The authorities are uniform in holding the doctrine-contended for by the counsel for administrator. Let an order be entered that the relief asked for in the petition be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

P. A. Rogers, Surrogate.

The petitioner comes too late-. I must apply the statute of limitations. In addition to the-cases cited by counsel, I know of McCabe agt. McCabe decided by the general term of the supreme court of the third-department, covering the points presented herein by the petition. The authorities are uniform in holding the doctrine-contended for by the counsel for administrator. Let an order be entered that the relief asked for in the petition be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 How. Pr. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-h-v-d-van-epps-nysurct-1882.