In re the Estate of Grusetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Grusetz

248 A.D.2d 618, 669 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 A.D.2d 618 (In re the Estate of Grusetz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Grusetz, 248 A.D.2d 618, 669 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding to recover shares of corporate stock that are claimed to be assets of the estate of Anne R. Grusetz, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Feinberg, S.), dated March 19, 1997, which denied their motion to deem a prior order of the same court (Bloom, S.), dated December 16, 1993, law of the case.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The March 19, 1997, order is in the nature of an evidentiary ruling made before trial. Therefore, the order is neither appealable as of right nor by permission (see, Maguire v Rebaglia, 232 AD2d 380; Rose v Velletri, 202 AD2d 566; Savarese v City of New York Hous. Auth., 172 AD2d 506; Pellegrino v New York City Tr. Auth., 141 AD2d 709; Cotgreave v Public Adm’r of Imperial County, 91 AD2d 600).

Joy, J. P., Krausman, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding to recover shares of corporate stock that are claimed to be assets of the estate of Anne R. Grusetz, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Feinberg, S.), dated March 19, 1997, which denied their motion to deem a prior order of the same court (Bloom, S.), dated December 16, 1993, law of the case.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The March 19, 1997, order is in the nature of an evidentiary ruling made before trial. Therefore, the order is neither appealable as of right nor by permission (see, Maguire v Rebaglia, 232 AD2d 380; Rose v Velletri, 202 AD2d 566; Savarese v City of New York Hous. Auth., 172 AD2d 506; Pellegrino v New York City Tr. Auth., 141 AD2d 709; Cotgreave v Public Adm’r of Imperial County, 91 AD2d 600).

Joy, J. P., Krausman, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 618, 669 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-grusetz-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack