In re the Estate of Grodsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Grodsky

26 A.D.2d 788, 273 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3469

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 788 (In re the Estate of Grodsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Grodsky, 26 A.D.2d 788, 273 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to judicially settle the executors’ intermediate account, the objectants appeal from two orders of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, as follows: (1) from an order entered May 17,. 1966, which inter alia granted the executors’ motion to [789]*789vacate the object ants’ demand for a jury trial and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order entered July 11, 1966, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision. Appeal from order entered May 17, 1966 dismissed, without costs. That order was superseded by the later order granting reargument. Order entered July 11, 1966 affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements payable by appellants to all respondents jointly. No opinion. Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to judicially settle the executors’ intermediate account, the objectants appeal from two orders of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, as follows: (1) from an order entered May 17,. 1966, which inter alia granted the executors’ motion to [789]*789vacate the object ants’ demand for a jury trial and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order entered July 11, 1966, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision. Appeal from order entered May 17, 1966 dismissed, without costs. That order was superseded by the later order granting reargument. Order entered July 11, 1966 affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements payable by appellants to all respondents jointly. No opinion. Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 788, 273 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-grodsky-nyappdiv-1966.