In re the Estate of Greene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Greene

87 A.D.2d 818, 450 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16274

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 87 A.D.2d 818 (In re the Estate of Greene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Greene, 87 A.D.2d 818, 450 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to judicially settle the account of the petitioner executor and trustee, the objectant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Brewster, S.), dated September 3, 1981, as, upon petitioner’s motion for a protective order, struck or limited certain of the objectant’s interrogatories. Order modified by deleting the provisions which limited the scope of Interrogatory Nos. 4 and 6 and substituting therefor a provision denying the motion for a protective order as to Item Nos. 4 and 6 and directing petitioner to respond to those items. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner’s time to respond to Item Nos. 4 and 6 is extended until 30 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. If petitioner lacks knowledge of the information requested or does not possess the documents he shall so state under oath. Item Nos. 4 and 6 of the objectant’s interrogatories should not have been limited. Titone, J. P., Lazer, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to judicially settle the account of the petitioner executor and trustee, the objectant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Brewster, S.), dated September 3, 1981, as, upon petitioner’s motion for a protective order, struck or limited certain of the objectant’s interrogatories. Order modified by deleting the provisions which limited the scope of Interrogatory Nos. 4 and 6 and substituting therefor a provision denying the motion for a protective order as to Item Nos. 4 and 6 and directing petitioner to respond to those items. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner’s time to respond to Item Nos. 4 and 6 is extended until 30 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. If petitioner lacks knowledge of the information requested or does not possess the documents he shall so state under oath. Item Nos. 4 and 6 of the objectant’s interrogatories should not have been limited. Titone, J. P., Lazer, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 818, 450 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-greene-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack