In re the Estate of Gould

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Gould

272 A.D.2d 827

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1947

DocketAppeals Nos. 1 and 2

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 827 (In re the Estate of Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Gould, 272 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under section 145-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act, to determine the validity and effect of an election, under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law, by the surviving spouse, the appellant herein, to take against the provisions of the will, the decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated November 13, 1946, denying the motion of the executors-respondents for judgment on the pleadings and adjourning the hearing of the motion for the purpose of taking further proof, and the decree dated November 25, 1946, which grants the motion, insofar as appealed from, are unanimously affirmed, with costs to all respondents filing briefs, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell,- Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ. [See post, p. 1019.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under section 145-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act, to determine the validity and effect of an election, under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law, by the surviving spouse, the appellant herein, to take against the provisions of the will, the decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated November 13, 1946, denying the motion of the executors-respondents for judgment on the pleadings and adjourning the hearing of the motion for the purpose of taking further proof, and the decree dated November 25, 1946, which grants the motion, insofar as appealed from, are unanimously affirmed, with costs to all respondents filing briefs, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell,- Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ. [See post, p. 1019.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-gould-nyappdiv-1947.