Home/New York Surrogate's Court/In re the Estate of Glickman

In re the Estate of Glickman

132 Misc. 785, 230 N.Y.S. 671, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1045
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedSeptember 18, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 132 Misc. 785 (In re the Estate of Glickman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Glickman, 132 Misc. 785, 230 N.Y.S. 671, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1045 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1928).

Opinion

Wingate, S.

A judgment for alimony is a judgment rendered after a verdict or decision imposing a liability on the husband to pay a particular amount of money, and it does not abate until its purpose is accomplished any more than any other judgment for money. (Carr v. Rischer, 119 N. Y. 117; Van Ness v. Ransom, 215 id. 557.) It follows, therefore, that the claim for interest on unpaid alimony is a proper charge against the estate of the decedent and is allowed. The other objections were disposed of on the hearing. Submit decree on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Audrey D. v. Michael O.
77 Misc. 2d 938 (NYC Family Court, 1974)
Roth v. Roth
47 Misc. 2d 701 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
In re the Estate of Schnirman
167 Misc. 809 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 Misc. 785, 230 N.Y.S. 671, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-glickman-nysurct-1928.