In re the Estate of Glickman
132 Misc. 785, 230 N.Y.S. 671, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1045
Opinion
A judgment for alimony is a judgment rendered after a verdict or decision imposing a liability on the husband to pay a particular amount of money, and it does not abate until its purpose is accomplished any more than any other judgment for money. (Carr v. Rischer, 119 N. Y. 117; Van Ness v. Ransom, 215 id. 557.) It follows, therefore, that the claim for interest on unpaid alimony is a proper charge against the estate of the decedent and is allowed. The other objections were disposed of on the hearing. Submit decree on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Estate of Glickman, 132 Misc. 785, 230 N.Y.S. 671, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1045 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1928).
132 Misc. 785 (In re the Estate of Glickman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Audrey D. v. Michael O.
77 Misc. 2d 938 (NYC Family Court, 1974)
Roth v. Roth
47 Misc. 2d 701 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
In re the Estate of Schnirman
167 Misc. 809 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)