In re the Estate of Getz

198 Misc. 218, 97 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1682
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedMay 12, 1950
StatusPublished

This text of 198 Misc. 218 (In re the Estate of Getz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Getz, 198 Misc. 218, 97 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1682 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1950).

Opinion

McGarey, S.

The respondent coexecutrix, testator’s widow, moves to dismiss the petition for her removal upon the ground it does not state sufficient facts to constitute the statutory grounds therefor. The petitioner is a son of testator by a prior marriage and is a devisee of a parcel of real property under the will. The coexecutor is an attorney.

The widow has filed a right of election under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law. That action by her necessarily affects the rights of the other legatees and devisees under the will. The gist of the petition herein is that the coexecutrix instituted estate tax proceedings wherein she returned the estate realty at higher valuations than that which were obtained and returned by the coexecutor. In her individual capacity as a person interested in the estate she could submit proof as to the valuation of the property to the appraiser (Tax Law, § 249-v). The assertion of such right by her in the performance of her executorial duty is a matter resting in her own judgment and upon her own responsibility (Wood v. Brown, 34 N. Y. 337, 343).

The court does not possess the power to control fiduciaries in the orderly discharge of their duties (Matter of Tompkins, 264 App. Div. 612, Matter of Levine, 189 Misc. 976). Nor would the court revoke letters in the absence of a showing that the fund or estate was in danger of being lost (Matter of Rosenberg, 213 App. Div. 167,170; Matter of Thieriot, 117 App. Div. 686, 690).

The respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition is accordingly granted.

Submit order, on notice, accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. . Brown
34 N.Y. 337 (New York Court of Appeals, 1866)
In re Thieriot
117 A.D. 686 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Rosenberg
213 A.D. 167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Sheldon v. Tompkins
264 A.D. 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
In re the Estate of Levine
189 Misc. 976 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 Misc. 218, 97 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-getz-nysurct-1950.