In re the Estate of Gandolfo

237 A.D.2d 115, 655 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2124
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered January 24, 1996, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The alleged breach of confidential or fiduciary duty occurred almost a year after the death of plaintiffs’ decedent. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ causes of action did not yet exist in decedent’s favor as of his death (cf., EPTL 11-3.2 [b]), and plaintiffs cannot press a cause of action that was not viable during decedent’s life (see, Sweets v Behrens, 88 AD2d 745, 746). We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments in support of their standing to sue and find them to be without merit. Since the complaint was properly dismissed, we do not reach plaintiffs’ alternate contention. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Gandolfo, 237 A.D.2d 115, 655 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 115 (In re the Estate of Gandolfo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucker v. Bayside Cemetery
114 A.D.3d 162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)