In re the Estate of Galasso

89 Misc. 2d 286, 391 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1835
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided January 25, 1977·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bertram R. Gelfand, S.

In this probate proceeding, the default of the nominated executor under a prior will on his application for leave to file objections has been vacated on consent. The application is considered on the merits.

Decedent died on August 6, 1976, survived by two brothers and a sister. There is offered for probate a paper writing dated July 25, 1976. Objections have been filed to the probate of this instrument by decedent’s sister and one brother. It is claimed that the will was not duly executed; that decedent lacked testamentary capacity and that its execution was procured by fraud and undue influence. All other parties in interest are opposed to this application.

One whose interest in an estate is limited to being a nominated fiduciary on an earlier will may file objections only if authorized by the court for "good cause shown” (SCPA 1410). In this proceeding all of the distributees have appeared by their respective attorneys and two of them as indicated above have filed objections. No purpose, except to burden the estate with avoidable expense, would be served in permitting movant to file an additional set of objections. Movant has not shown the good cause required by the statute to obtain the relief he seeks. Accordingly, the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Galasso, 89 Misc. 2d 286, 391 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1835 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1977).

89 Misc. 2d 286 (In re the Estate of Galasso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Carey
236 A.D.2d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Estate of Peckolick
167 Misc. 2d 597 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1996)