In re the Estate of Freeman

170 A.D.2d 986, 566 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1712
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The Surrogate’s Court did not lack either subject matter or personal jurisdiction to revoke petitioner’s letters of administration (see, SCPA 201, 203, 711 [4]; 719 [10]). The decision to revoke such letters pursuant to SCPA 719 (10) rests within the discretion of the Surrogate’s Court and, based upon the record before us, it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion in revoking petitioner’s letters (see, Matter of Menis, 137 AD2d 692, 693). Accordingly, the petition to vacate the judgment revoking petitioner’s letters was properly dismissed. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Surrogate’s Court, Mattina, S.—Vacate Judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Freeman, 170 A.D.2d 986, 566 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

170 A.D.2d 986 (In re the Estate of Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Kelsall
79 A.D.3d 1234 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)