In re the Estate of Frame

238 A.D. 811
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is not sufficient evidence contained in the record upon which to base a conclusion as to the value of the services rendered to the estate, as distinguished from those rendered for the benefit of Waddell. We are not in a position, therefore, under the circumstances disclosed, to determine whether the allowance as made is excessive or correctly measures the value of the services. The decree of the Surrogate’s Court should be reversed, with costs to the appellants payable out of the estate, and the matter remitted to that court for further consideration. The surrogate may deem it wise to permit this matter to await the final accounting. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ. Decree appealed from reversed, with costs to the appellants payable out of the estate, and the proceeding remitted to the surrogate for further action in accordance with the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Frame, 238 A.D. 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

238 A.D. 811 (In re the Estate of Frame) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re for a Compulsory Accounting in the Estate of Frame
245 A.D. 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
In re the Estate of Frame
152 Misc. 475 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1934)
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Foreman
240 A.D. 961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)