In re the Estate of Forgione

77 A.D.3d 943, 909 N.Y.S.2d 391

Opinion

In a probate proceeding, the petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Riordan, S.), dated May 18, 2009, as granted the respondent’s motion pursuant to CELR 3126 to dismiss the proceeding.

[944]*944Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the petitioner personally.

The Surrogate’s Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the respondent’s motion to dismiss the proceeding pursuant to CPLR 3126 because of the petitioner’s extensive delay in scheduling the examinations of out-of-state attesting witnesses pursuant to SCPA 1404 (see Rizzuti v Laucella, 57 AD3d 755 [2008]). Dillon, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Forgione, 77 A.D.3d 943, 909 N.Y.S.2d 391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

77 A.D.3d 943 (In re the Estate of Forgione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rizzuti v. Laucella
57 A.D.3d 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)