In re the Estate of Fay

62 Misc. 154
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Estate of Fay. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 Mills Surr. 72
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided January 15, 1909·Published

Opinion

Beckett, S.

This is an appeal by the executor from an order which assessed a tax of $50 upon a bequest to the Mt. Auburn Cémetery Association. The decedent directed his executor to pay to the Mt. Auburn Cemetery Association the sum of $1,000, so that the interest of this sum will keep my lot in good condition forever.” The cemetery association is a Massachusetts corporation. The executor contends that the bequest is to be considered as part of the funeral expenses and, therefore, not taxable. In Matter of Vinot, 7 N. Y. Supp. 517, Surrogate ¡Ransom held that a bequest of $1,000 to an association the income of which was to be applied to the care and preservation of the burial plot of decedent was not taxable. As this decision has not been overruled by a higher court, it might be considered as a controlling authority in this case. In view, however, of the language of the Court of Appeals in the Gould case, 156 N. Y. 423, and of the Appellate Division in the McAvoy case, 112 App. Div. 377, it would appear that the decision in the Matter of Vinot would scarcely meet with the approval of the appellate courts at the present time. In the Gould case it was held that the property was taxable, although bequeathed for the purpose of satisfying a contractual obliga[155]*155tion existing at the time of decedent’s death; and in the McAvoy case it was held that the bequest was taxable, although the beneficiary received it in payment of services to be rendered thereafter. While it has been held that a sum spent by an executor in the erection of a monument to decedent is exempt (Matter of Edgerton, 35 App. Div. 125), and that a reasonable sum spent in the purchase of a burial plot for decedent may be regarded as a part of the funeral expenses and, therefore, a proper deduction (Matter of Liss, 39 Misc. Rep. 123), there is a manifest distinction between such expenditures made by an executor in his discretion and a bequest made by decedent in his last will to a certain beneficiary and for a certain specific purpose. In the latter case the property passes to the beneficiary by virtue of the provisions in decedent’s will, and as the statute provides that all property passing by will (if not going to parties specifically mentioned as being exempt) is taxable, the bequest to the Mt. Auburn Cemetery Association would seem to be taxable.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Fay, 62 Misc. 154 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1909).

62 Misc. 154 (In re the Estate of Fay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Appraisal of the Property of Edgerton
35 A.D. 125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of McAvoy
112 A.D. 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
In re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Property of Liss
3 Mills Surr. 305 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1902)
In re Vinot's Estate
7 N.Y.S. 517 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1889)